Line up ladies, he’s single.
Tag: contemporary anthropology
Playing Tricks
Recently I was running an errand when a sign caught my eye. As I drove closer, the sign persisted in saying what it said. I actually wondered, “Is there a big market for that sort of thing? Do people come in on their lunch hour, or what?”
Last night I was watching the Lost season finale (pretty much the only broadcast television I’ve watched in a month) when I saw a commercial for Breyers ice cream. I swore the package said “Double Chum“. Again with the thinking, “Is there a big market for that sort of thing?”
After I finished being amused, I remembered when I was 18 and spent a summer teaching magic at a performing arts camp outside of Hancock, New York. The only entertainment after the campers went to bed (aside from fucking other staff) was the only bar within walking distance, whose sole reason for existing was us. It was named, simply, SALOON, spelled out on the face of the structure in a Western, wanted-poster-style font:
At any sort of distance, it read SHLOON, which was what everyone called it and inevitably pronounced it after we had had a few anyway.
Heh.
It Tolls for Thee
The Smoking Gun posts mug shots, confidential documents, transcripts, legal filings, rock band riders – all kinds of lurid material. One of my favorite mug shots – actually, one of my favorite images ever – is of Patrick Tribett, arrested for huffing paint. The image has such gravity I can only look at it for short periods.
Amazingly, the Smoking Gun recently located another mug shot of a fellow arrested under similar circumstances to our Mr. Tribett. The image is not iconic in the way that Mr. Tribett’s is, but nevertheless captures its subject poignantly.
Some would say that while publishing celebrity mug shots is fair game, posting images of regular people is cruel. Someone makes a dumb mistake (NSFW) and it lives on the Internet forever (well, 17 years and counting). People change, forgive, forget, and move on, but the Internet never forgets.
I do not disagree, but the genie is out of the bottle. The reality is that our actions now have searchable memories, so it’s best on general principles to keep your footprint small, and try not to become a meme.
Visa Can Bite My Priceless Bag
You may have seen the Visa commercial “Lunch” featuring a highly efficient delicatessen, food literally flying off the grill, and everyone checking out at the register with a Visa check card without even breaking stride – all to the tune Powerhouse.
The whole operation breaks down, the commercial shows us, when some inconsiderate prick uses cash. The music comes to a calamitous halt, food crashes to the floor, people run into one another, and everyone stares at the man like he’s a herpe while the register clerk makes his change.
This is the first ad I’ve seen where cash is made out to be the bad guy, and I yell at the television every time it comes on. See, I love cash. I use it whenever possible and, despite Visa’s depiction to the contrary, my experience is that cash is still superior to electronic debit for retail transactions.
A few properties of cash that I enjoy are:
- It is accepted nearly everywhere.
- It spends even when the power is out and communications are down.
- My experience is that I get through most retail transactions faster than my debit card-wielding counterparts.
- The benefits of anonymity extend beyond privacy. Because cash transactions do not couple any of my accounts with my purchases, fewer records exist that are prone to compromise via dumpster diving, dishonest clerks or hacking.
- Cash is easily transferable. I can hand my wife a hundred dollars in cash without any intermediary.
- Cash can get things done that electronic debit cannot, e.g., slipping the maitre’d a Jackson for better/faster seating. If this is not an issue for you, I suggest that you aren’t living life to its fullest.
- Cash is a better deal both for retailers and customers. Retailers pay no fee (typically a flat 7.5 to 10 cents for debit, and up to a usurious 2% for credit), and customers are not at risk of discovering increasingly common point-of-sale fees on their monthly bank statements.
Cash isn’t ideal for everything. I pay all of my bills online, for example, because the benefits of eliminating all that paper (invoices, envelopes, checks) outweigh the costs (persistent records, transaction fees). Privacy doesn’t enter into it because my identity is already coupled to the accounts that I settle electronically.
In addition, cash does not scale well – paying for a car or house in cash is inconvenient and likely to invite scrutiny by our dedicated public servants at the Internal Revenue Service, Drug Enforcement Agency and Department of Homeland Security. And earlier this year, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that “..possession of a large amount of cash…is strong evidence that the cash is connected with the drug trade,” and the cash can legally be seized.
With their irritating commercial, Visa is attempting to create a perception that simply doesn’t live up to its claims. I will continue using cash whenever I can, for as long as it’s around, and I recommend anyone consider doing the same. The world will be a slightly cooler place for it.
Intended Consequences
Okay, so this jackass Jason Fortuny posed as a woman seeking BDSM sex on the Seattle Craig’s List personals. On his LiveJournal page he stated that he was conducting an experiment to see how many responses he could get in 24 hours. He got 178. The majority included images, which ranged in content from headshots to genitalia. He then posted the replies (NSFW) online.
That is, he posted the replies online, in their entirety, including e-mail addresses, IM handles and phone numbers.
Holy crap.
Now 178 people, none of whom did anything illegal, find that what was ostensibly personal correspondence is displayed for all the world to see. That’s just plain wrong.
Did some of these fellows demonstrate breathtaking ignorance by sending their replies from business or otherwise “non-throw-away” e-mail accounts, using their full names and images including their faces? Absolutely. Having read the responses, I can say with confidence that the reputations of future Nobel Prize winners remain intact.
So? Ignorance isn’t criminal (thank God). Otherwise we would just slap a lid over the United States and have done with it. That’s not the point. This was no “experiment.” It was a juvenile, malicious prank with no purpose other than to inflict harm, then chortle smugly at those exposed. Only a truly damaged person behaves like that.
Abraham Lincoln said:
Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.
Jason Fortuny entrapped a bunch of guys looking for no-strings rough sex. His power came from offering something that these men wanted. He then used that power to burn them publicly, for no other reason than that he could.
I offer two things to consider:
- As my friend Gokmop has reminded me several times, do not put anything online (via web site, blog, forum, e-mail, whatever) that you don’t want made available and searchable, forever.
- I posted an article about instances where actions on the Internet cross over into Real Lifeā¢. Jason Fortuny may well experience the downside of that phenomenon.